A Truine Basis (06/07/24)
As is observed in the footnotes of the NET, this passage consists in
one, lengthy if-then statement, of which verse 1 is
the protasis, or if clause. It comes as a first-class conditional,
which indicates that what is proposed in the first verse is taken as
true. In the realm of rhetoric, such a clause might simply be for the
sake of argument. Let’s assume these things are so, for the sake of
argument. It follows, then, that… But here, there is no need for
supposition, for positing hypotheticals. Paul knows his audience, and
knows well of their faithful pursuit of gospel life.
What I found intriguing, as I began collecting my thoughts for this
study, was how, in the first few parts of this if clause, we are
presented with experience of the Trinity. Look closely. You don’t
even need to look all that closely. It’s just there. And remember
that these are being set forth as pretty much a given in their case.
Look, then, at this first condition. Is there any encouragement in
Christ? Here, we have paraklesis, which
we may associate more with the Holy Spirit. But remember, he comes as
another Paraklete. We
already know one in Jesus. In coming to faith, we have answered His
call. But in so answering, we have also called Him alongside to our
aid, which gets us to the base sense of the term. So, we might hear
this as, “Is Jesus at your side to help?”
Then we come to the consolation of love, as the NASB presents it.
Have you known the consolation of love? Now, we might rightly
attribute love to any and all persons of the Trinity, for God is Love
(1Jn 4:8). But I think we can attribute it
particularly to the Father. We need but consider that most known of
verses, John 3:16. God so loved the world
that He gave His only begotten Son… Well, the Son could not, in this
formulation, give Himself. To be sure, He came freely, of His own
volition, but He came because the Father loved enough to send Him.
And when we come to the love of God towards man, we see the unique
nature of this love, a love so distinct from the various loves of
human experience that it required a new word to describe it: agape.
This love is not Hallmark love. It is not the companionableness of
brotherly love. And it is certainly not the passion of lovers. It is
something distinct. It may well be that in certain contexts those
other aspects of love might apply to this relationship as well. We
are, after all, described as the bride of His Son. But in this act,
as Zhodiates takes pains to observe in his lexical entry on this term,
God acted with self-sacrificial benevolence. And this benevolence, it
must be observed, took place in spite of our total disinterest and
even outright rejection. I’m not finding the verse I have in mind
this morning, but this one suffices to make the point. “For
if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the
death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be
saved by His life” (Ro 5:10).
While we were still His enemies, He sacrificed His own life that we
might live! Or go back a few verses. God demonstrated His love
toward us in that while we were still sinners, still actively opposing
Him, Christ died for us (Ro 5:8). This is
the love we’re talking about when we come to agape,
which is probably the most common variant of love mentioned in the New
Testament. Older translations tended to translate it as charity, but
while it is charitable, it seems to me there’s far greater depths to
it than that.
So, now, coming back to our verse, we have this matter of
consolation, paramuthion. We have
already, Christ come alongside us to help, to encourage. Now, we have
another alongside, another para. This one
has a curious derivation, going back to muthos,
a tale, a fable. But that is not to suggest that God’s love is but a
fable, a myth to keep us quiescent or compliant. I see also that in
this derivation, we are travelling farther, to a middle-voice of mueo, to teach. So, middle voice: done for
oneself, or action shared between subject and object. I suppose
teaching must ever be so, mustn’t it? It can’t happen without an
active teacher, nor can it happen without an actively engaged
student. So, then, we must understand that while muthos
may indicate a mere tale or fable, it also applies to truth
and the imparting of truth. Thus, when we arrive back at our matter
of consolation, it can have a sense of persuasive address. Has God’s
love convinced you? Have you had persuasive experience of His love
for you? Well, certainly, if you have known the Son come alongside to
your aid, you have experienced God’s love, for as we just noted, it
was from His love that the Son was sent.
Finally, we have the fellowship of the Spirit, the koinonia.
It’s an interesting bit of connective tissue, given how agape
came to describe those times shared by the early church, when
they would gather to break bread together, taking not only Communion,
but also a shared meal. These must have been times to truly knit the
body together in mutual care and interest such as we find encouraged
in the remainder of this passage. But koinonia has
something of that same sense to it, doesn’t it? In our present
practice, Pastor is seeking to reestablish a habit of such fellowship
among us, which is assuredly of value. We do not engage sufficiently
with one another on an average Sunday to truly know one another, to
have a sense of each other’s particular trials and triumphs. We may
know some little snippet of information about one another, but there’s
no depth. Sadly, I should have to say that the same applies in the
family life of too many today. We may share space, but we don’t
share. We’ve been encouraged to isolation, each off in his or her own
space pursuing his or her own interests. But here? No, koinonia
goes much farther than simply meeting for a meal, or even
than cohabiting. This speaks of joint participation, and that, I have
to say, drives strongly into the apodosis, the ‘then’
conditions of this passage.
But we’re still here in the ‘if’, in the
foundational truths. Are you participating together with the Spirit
who indwells you? One would hope so! Again, we have already observed
the Son come alongside, and the love of the Father poured out. Now,
here is that other paraklete.
Here is God, Who is Spirit, come to occupy His own temple, the temple
of your body. If He is indwelling, I would certainly hope there is
joint participation. Otherwise, life is likely to prove most
turbulent. Isn’t that what we see in matters of demonic possession?
This is not, at least in the general case, a welcome development in
the life of the one possessed. At least in their more coherent
moments, they know something’s terribly wrong. There is, as it were,
a second mind operating, and operating quite at odds and antithetical
to one’s own thoughts and preferences.
Now, to be fair, at least in early days, we may well find the
presence of the Spirit, speaking as He does to our conscience, to
likewise seem antithetical to our own thoughts and preferences. But
that is because our own thoughts and preferences are so tainted by a
lifelong pursuit of sinfulness. We have our habits, our lusts, and
they are not easily given up. Indeed, prior to this invasion, if you
will, of the Trinity into our lives, it was quite impossible,
unthinkable really. After all, sin and lust were pretty much all we
had known. The pursuit of our own interests and desires had been
encouraged in us every moment of every day, and nothing said to the
contrary, unless our interests set us at cross-purposes with somebody
stronger, and we found it needful to give way, at least for the
moment.
But now? Now, we have come to know, to be persuaded by the love of
our Father for us. We have met God and discovered that while He is
assuredly all-knowing and all-powerful, He is not some vindictive
tyrant to be appeased. He is our Father. He loves
us, wants (and provides), only the best for us. And we have been
aided by the Son, come alongside us to free us from our blind
enslavement to the lusts of the flesh and the desires of the world.
That doesn’t mean we become aesthetes, forsaking every worldly
pleasure and hiding away in our spiritual dens. No. God created the
world, and He created wonderfully well. There is much beauty to be
observed in the work of His hands, and He clearly intends that we
should have joy of that beautiful display of His workmanship.
This comes as the core of Paul’s levelling of the playing field in Romans,
as he observes the absence of ignorance as an excuse for unbelief. “For since the creation of the world His invisible
attributes, His eternal power, His divine nature, have been clearly
seen, made understandable through what has been made. They are
without excuse” (Ro 1:20). Sure
and the atheist can find joy in nature. Many even undertake to
worship it in one aspect or another. What else are we to make of the
fanaticism of environmentalists? It’s just another paganism, dressed
up in the clothes of modernity and ostensible science. But in
reality, it cares little for science, and seeks only the validation of
that label. But for the Christian? Well, you’ve a choice to make.
You can look about you and see nothing but fallenness and evil, and
many a Christian does just that, seeing nothing in life but things to
be decried and rejected. But there is another perspective to be
taken, and it seems to me the wiser one. God made these things!
There is beauty yet, in spite of the worst man has done. Birds still
sing, flowers still bloom, sun and rain come in their turn. There are
things to taste, things to smell, things to touch, which truly
delight. And I don’t really think we need limit ourselves to things
of the natural order. The creativity of man can likewise discover its
proper source in God, and in some periods of history has done just
that.
Consider the things that have lasted, down through the ages. The
finest of paintings have often taken up biblical themes. The finest,
most universally celebrated pieces of music came of men deeply devoted
to Christ and His Church. Consider the markings of Bach upon his
scores: TGBTG – To God be the Glory. Consider Brahms who, having
spent hours in prayer would, if the composition was not forthcoming,
return to that place of prayer until God set in his mind the melody,
the harmony to be pursued. Consider how many of our greatest books,
and for all that, our greatest movies, have at their base a theme
drawn from the gospel. Even the renewed Dr. Who, at least in its
earlier seasons, tended to find itself presenting gospel themes and
gospel images. I strongly recall the finale of that first season,
with all humanity imperiled by a massive force of Daleks, and the
thing that stood in the way of their evil was a space station which,
as the view pulled back, had a clearly cruciform shape. Intentional?
Possibly, perhaps even probably. But intentional or not, the image is
there. God works as He will, even in the hands of impure man, even
through the likes of you and me.
So, then, here we are. The Trinity, and our relationship to the
Trinity is the first foundation of Paul’s encouragement here. Apart
from this basis, there’s no point in continuing. The rest becomes an
impossibility, or at the very least a vain exercise. Am I suggesting
that the unbeliever has no capacity for affection and compassion? Not
at all. These are common to man. But as one enters into this
love-persuaded, Christ-empowered joint participation in God’s plan and
purpose, affection and compassion take on new dimensions. There’s
more to our affection for one another than a few shared hobbies.
There’s more to our affection than reciprocity. To be sure, there’s
new shared experiences held in common. For those with whom we have
been knit together as a body have likewise entered into this
love-persuaded, Christ-empowered joint participation in God. We are
of one Father. That point is stressed repeatedly. We are family, and
family more closely knit than even the best of physical families.
These are your mother, your brother, your sister.
It may well be that we have had to sever some of our earthly family
ties, or that they have at least suffered degradation because of our
love for Christ, a love not shared by our siblings or parents or
children, as the case may be. They may have become to us more a
mission field than a sanctuary. So be it. The one who will not leave
them behind to follow Christ is unworthy of Him. And this, too, is
love. It won’t feel that way in the moment, but it is. It won’t be
perceived as such by those from whom we have found it necessary to
withdraw. But it is. It’s a higher love. And that higher love may,
in due course, lead us to preach the gospel to them, whether they wish
to hear it or not. But in doing so, we shall have to remain mindful
that it is God’s decision how the power of the gospel shall impact the
hearer, whether as life unto life, or as death unto death.
That’s an uncomfortable point to stop, I admit. But it must needs be
so. So, hear again the foundation laid, the things assumed to be true
of you and me. I’ll repeat my paraphrase of this first verse of the
chapter. Have you known Christ’s help? Have you felt His love? Is
the Spirit indwelling? Have you any affection, any compassion? I
know you do! It may not feel that way, particularly in the affection
and compassion department. Yet, just as assured as you are of your
being called by the Triune God, just as assured as you are that Christ
died for you, that the Spirit indwells you, just so assured can you be
that this affection and compassion is growing in you, the fruit of
that very indwelling Spirit, the evidence of God’s power at work in
you. It is not yet perfected, but there is a proper trajectory to
your character. Those things that lie ahead truly do lie ahead, not
because of your diligence and exertion, though these are called for.
No, at base, most fundamentally, it is because God loves you, saved
you, and now guides and shapes you. You are His, and He does not
fail. This, too, should be a matter of consolation to you, a matter
of which you are most fully persuaded. If it is not so, I pray God
would make it so. You need this foundation, as I need this
foundation. It is the necessary platform for growth in Christ.
The Church Represents (06/08/24)
As we move into verse 2, we pick up the apodosis,
the ‘then’ clause of this point Paul is
making. And it begins with an imperative: Complete my joy. Fill it
up to the full. Make it like that fishing net that Peter and the boys
pulled into the boat when Jesus first called them, and He told them to
cast their nets in one specific place. Fill it up like the sacks of
grain that Joseph sent his brothers home with back in Egypt. And
then, he moves into indicating those things that will bring him joy.
And what will bring him joy is seeing this church represent.
Paul had already seen them represent. He was experiencing that from
his prison cell even as he wrote. They had sent along their own
pastor to minister to his needs there in Rome. They had sent funding
– again. This was something he had experienced from them repeatedly
over the years since first he preached to what would become the first
members of that church. They were already a source of much joy to
him, and by and large, already operating in exactly the ways he now
urges them to pursue. In effect, he is encouraging them to keep doing
what they have been doing. Hold fast and grow. Hold fast and grow.
What he is encouraging are those things that are at least as much the
marks of the true church as are the things we usually see identified.
The Word preached, the sacraments rightly observed, the exercise of
church discipline as required; all of these are indeed marks of the
true church. But I would have to say that, if not accompanied by
these practices now set before us, I am not sure I could account them
sufficient marks. What have we got? We’ve got a mutual devotion.
We’ve got a church giving evidence of being sons and daughters of one
Father. How does this express? They share the family
characteristics, the family interests, the family mindset.
Look at what is being urged here. Be of the same mind. Think
alike. Have the same mindset, the same interests. Be one in the
exercise of your will. Maintain the same love. How could it be
otherwise, if indeed God has poured out his love in you? For it is
that same agape love of the Father that
is in view here. Each of you: Love as God loves. Be united in
spirit. It’s actually stronger than that. It’s presented in one
word, sumpsuchoi, same-spirited, or more
properly, same-souled. Be so unanimous as to be joined in soul. You
are, after all, organs of one body. It stands to reason that there
would be one soul, one accord of feeling and mutual affection.
Zhodiates goes so far as to suggest that this same-souled, co-spirited
state defines a community of life and love, which
is exactly what Paul is seeking to describe here. And then, we have
one purpose. We’re back to the mind again, the direction of the
will. Only now, it is being given as a descriptive, a verbal
adjective that ought to describe the ongoing, steady-state activity of
the believer. Be of one mind, intent on one purpose. What purpose?
Well, we could call it the purpose of truly being a church. We could
call it the purpose of manifesting Christ, of being and functioning as
His body according to His design and purpose. Indeed, we who have the
mind of Christ ought by rights to be pursuing the one purpose of His
purposing.
You see, then, that what is urged here directly flows from what is
assumed. If Christ is alongside, God has loved, the Spirit indwells
in union with you, then show it! I could, without stretching things
too far, take this as, then you will show it. If
the Spirit dwells in the temple of your body, then the fruit of the
Spirit will grow in you. If you are in the Vine,
then you will bear fruit. Here is where we can get
ourselves into trouble. If we look at this as simply a to-do list, a
new set of commandments to try and maintain, then we shall be back in
the same boat as those who sought to find righteousness in adhering to
the law of Moses. We shall be striving in the flesh when the whole
matter depends on the Spirit. We will come to that point more fully
as this chapter continues, so I’ll leave it to that place to consider
this point more fully. What I would have us see at this juncture is
simply this: If, as is clearly the case, you are abiding
in the Triune God who called you, then of course you will have the
same passions and interests – Christ and His glory; then of course you
will be giving expression to that love which God has poured out upon
you – both towards one another and towards the worldly; then of course
you are united in your soul – you are one body; then assuredly you are
seeking the same goal – the purpose of Christ in seeing this gospel
proclaimed and further souls saved.
I want to now combine some fragments from a few translations, in hope
of giving us an even stronger picture of how we represent this God Who
so loved us. ‘Cherish the same views, since you
have this love, this same divine self-sacrificial love’ of
the Father, such that you are ‘joined in the soul,
thinking one thing’. I’m taking from the One New Man, Wuest,
and Darby in this combined presenting of the text. And I think it is
that last part that presents us with the greatest challenge, isn’t
it? Well, no. Honestly, it’s the whole thing.
Be joined in soul and sentiment, to borrow from Zhodiates’ definition
of things. That’s hard enough between husband and wife, between the
best of friends! And now, we’re talking a community of such singular
depth of fellowship. No. This moves miles beyond mere fellowship.
We can participate together in a thing, labor together in it, and
still be nowhere near having a unity of soul. Arguably, every
workplace fits that level of fellowship. For most of us, we probably
spend more waking hours together with our coworkers than with our own
families. Perhaps that is less so with the rise of remote work, but
the example still holds well enough. Here is a place where we are
hopefully laboring together. The workplace that hasn’t at least got
this going for it is going to be a particularly miserable place, and
those who can avoid having to be there will do just that. But family
life can take the same course, can’t it? We live together. We take
care of business. We see to it that the house is fit to live in, the
grounds are kept up, the kids are raised to be something better than
feral beasts. But one-souled? Maybe. Some couples attain to it, but
by no means all. Some don’t even try.
Have the same love for one another, this self-sacrificial love such
as the Father has demonstrated towards you. Give expression to His
love. Well, until you brought that matter of self-sacrifice into the
picture, we were good with that. I can love my brother. Sure. It’s
only for brief periods anyway, right? We try and be amiable at
church, to lend an ear even if we’re not all that interested in the
topic being discussed. We try to set aside our differences, such as
they are, to be polite. But that’s not what Paul is talking about.
Not at all. We’re so far beyond politeness that this sort of love
might very well wind up being viewed as offensive, specifically by the
one towards whom we are expressing such love. Again: This is the
sort of love that will take action on behalf of the loved one even
when he or she is dead set against that very action. We might
construe it as interventionist love, willing to step in and get messy
when the one we love seems blind to their peril, or too weak to even
recognize the need to help themselves.
Be same-souled. My, but we have many who are too deeply concerned
with severing soul-ties to be same-souled with much of anybody! And
again, I might observe that even in that closest of relationships that
must arise between married couples, this proves a challenge that is
beyond us. We are informed that we are in a one-flesh relationship,
that in marriage, we are no longer our own, but each belongs to the
other, submits to the other, loves the other as Christ loved the
Church, giving Himself up for her. And this is hard! I could easily
argue that it’s impossible, at least in our own strength. And in
fact, I should argue that. This whole list is
impossible in our own strength, and that’s rather the point. That
doesn’t mean we needn’t bother trying. It means we’d best be leaning
hard on that help of Christ, on that love of the Father, on that
fellowship of the Spirit, else we’ll fail utterly. It’s true in
marriage, which I dare say, is precisely why so many marriages fail.
It’s true as well in the Church, and where the Church suffers division
and disunity, this same problem lies at the root: That body has been
trying to live godly without having recourse to God.
Be intent on one purpose. Okay. With all due respect to the NASB,
there is nothing here to translate as ‘intent’.
It is simply ‘of one mind’. The nearest I
can get this is that being of one mind, we are pursuing one purpose.
We have one intention. This is, again, the directing of the will and
the affections towards some goal, some moral consideration. Well,
certainly, faced with the same moral challenge, our desire should be
that we would all of us likewise conclude the right course of action.
And perhaps, that’s really the extent of it here. There is such a
stress on singularity here that it really does feel as though Paul is
urging not just unity but unison, a people marching in lockstep, with
no personal thought, no personal opinion, but only some overpowering
directive from on high. And I think that image serves us poorly.
There is the realm of automatons, moved about entirely by the whim of
some controlling power, with no personal volition and no personal
culpability.
To be clear, that is not the church, not the
Christian worldview. We have much in common, yet we also have much
that is individually distinct. It is the way God has made us, the way
He designed us, the way He intends us to be. There is a reason we
find the individuals within the church described by Paul as members or
organs of the one body. We have our unique features. We each have
our particular perspectives to bring, our particular priorities,
talents and yes, weaknesses, too. When our men gather together of a
Tuesday to consider what we have read in the Scriptures, there is
great variety in what has stood out, as well as those points that
speak to all of us. There are perspectives that one brother may bring
to the discussion that others had not even considered. And it’s
wonderful! It’s not a debate club. It’s not one of us insisting on
this point of doctrine, and another denouncing it. It is the practice
of exactly what the Church is intended to experience: Each one of us
lending our gifts and perspectives to the edification, the building
up, of one another.
We are indeed joined in soul and sentiment. By design. But we
remain unique in our individual areas of focus within that unity of
soul and sentiment. And that begins to steer me towards the next
portion of this study. I’ll foreshadow it just a bit with this
version of verse 2 from the Amplified Bible. “Fill up and complete my joy by living in harmony
and being of the same mind and one in purpose, having the
same love, being in full accord and of one harmonious mind
and intention” [emphasis mine].
This unity is not unison. It is harmonious, just as, when we sing our
hymns and praises together, not all sing or play the same note, yet we
are all singing one song. And, God willing, we do so harmoniously.
And if we do not, well, we shall have resort to the Holy Spirit to
render our offering of song pleasing in the ears of our God and in the
ears of one another.
Lord, help us towards this goal. Keep us mindful that apart from
You, there is no hope of attaining to these ends. Indeed, keep us
mindful that apart from You, there is nothing we can do, certainly
nothing good. Let us, then, draw from Your present help, your
extravagant love, your intimate fellowship with us, that we might be
a present help to one another, truly love one another with the same
love in which You have loved us, and enter into a fullness of close
fellowship together – all with a purpose of showing forth Your own
most excellent attributes amidst a world sorely lacking in them, to
the glory of Your name and the expansion of Your kingdom. Come,
perfect Your work in us, that we may rightly represent Your work as
beacons in this darkness.
Unity in Diversity (06/09/24)
This is our challenge: Be of the same mind. The NET takes this as
the main concern of the whole passage. We have that if clause laying
the foundation, and we have the imperative command to complete Paul’s
joy, to fill it up. And then comes, hina,
indicating the purpose or result. Here is the goal: That you be of
the same mind. The rest, being presented as participles, serve as
descriptors identifying what that looks like, or how such
same-mindedness is to be achieved. And yet, when I look at it, this
call to unity seems such a lofty goal as to be unobtainable.
Just look at us! Look at us in our smallest units of community, in
the family, even the childless family. Would you consider you and
your spouse to be of the same mind in all things? I sincerely doubt
it! You may, after discussion, arrive at agreement on this or that
matter, but more than likely it is an agreement achieved not by
like-mindedness, but by compromise. Or maybe that’s just me. I
rather doubt it, though. Share the same love. Well, I suppose at
base, I can say that in that we both love Christ, yes, we share that.
In that we have both known the love of God poured out upon us, and
experienced the change of heart that comes of His call and choosing,
sure. We share the same love. But how differently it is
experienced! How differently it is expressed!
Take this to the scope of the Church, then, and again, at least so
far as it concerns those who truly have membership in the church
invisible, the True Church, yes, we can profess a shared love. But
again, the variety of expression it is given, the varied progress we
have made in knowing and loving God, renders it very difficult to view
it as really the same.
United in spirit? Intent on one purpose? Again, if we are
considering those who are truly in Christ, truly of the elect, the
redeemed, then at some level this must be true. It is, after all, the
same Holy Spirit indwelling us all, and it is at the command of one
Lord and Savior that we move, at least when we are moving as He
directs. But does it really feel this way? Have you ever been in a
church where it felt this way? Honestly, there is much in us, in me
at least, that rebels at the very idea of being so consumed by the
need to comply and march in one direction together. I would agree
that we are headed in the same general direction, but it still seems
to me that we travel at different speeds, on different routes. We
each of us have our own pursuits which one hopes still serve the
general purpose, serve to edify and build up one another, and to reach
the lost, but I am truly bothered by calls that insist we must all
focus on this one task, this one means. Does not Scripture speak of
us as members of a body, members with different functions, different
pursuits? How, then, this insistence on unity, this seeming call to
unison?
Okay, so I’ve already at least hinted at the point that this is not
in fact a call to unison, but to unity. These are two different
things. Unison applies primarily to song, to singing the same pitch
at the same time. But it can also apply to acting or speaking in
unison, all at the same doing saying or doing the same thing. Unity
is perhaps a tad softer in meaning, indicating a state of being joined
together, in agreement. I take that from the Cambridge Dictionary.
And it assuredly fits the case here. Be in agreement. There is a
sense of the parts being related. But it’s a step or two short of
being identical.
So, how are we to maintain unity when our views so differ, and our
priorities are at odds? Well, it may help if we recognize that these
participles do apply to our brothers and sisters. They do share
the same love, the same spirit. They are pursuing
the same ultimate purpose. And to the degree that this is not the
case with us, we should most certainly be seeking that it might become
so. Here, I dare say, is the call to look to the log in your own eye
before becoming overly concerned with the speck in your brother’s eye
(Mt 7:3-5). We must first return to those
founding assumptions: That we have known Christ’s help, the Father’s
love, the Spirit’s fellowship. If this is not the case, then frankly,
we are not yet of the body, not yet called and redeemed, and I can
only pray that God would yet call you. Or, if it is I who lack that
call, that I would hear His call, know His touch, and respond as I
should, as I must. But, let me join Paul in accepting that this much
is settled. We have known His call, have responded, and do know
fellowship with the Trinity, know it deeply, intimately.
We come, then, to these descriptors for what it is like to be
same-minded: You have and maintain this same love. More rightly, I
think, God expresses His same love through you. But never without
your active participation, so we can leave it as it was: You give
expression to this love of God. You do share the same spirit, being
indwelt by the same Holy Spirit. How could you not? Where the seed
is, the fruit grows. You are pursuing the same purpose, being
likewise servants of the same God. Now: If you discern in yourself
that any of these points are lacking, if you discover in yourself that
you are not giving expression to the love of God; if you find yourself
constantly at loggerheads with your brethren; if, heaven forbid, you
do not perceive the leading of the Spirit within you, guiding your
conscience and your actions, then surely the antidote comes in deep
prayerful repentance. We must ask ourself, are you availing yourself
of those means of grace which God so richly supplies? Are you taking
the time to truly soak in His Word? Really? I don’t simply mean
ticking off so much time reading it. I don’t even mean this practice
of mine, of taking to the study of it first thing in the morning
daily. These can become mere rote motions, things done without depth
of involvement. Surely, as I explore these lengthy periods of
writing, it can devolve into nothing but opinion. It can be but the
expression of things that are on my mind. But that’s not the goal.
That should not be the goal. The goal is to absorb the lessons of
God’s Word more fully, to drill them deep into the soul. And where
that is being done, they surely begin to take root, to grow, to
flourish as we continue to water the work.
Okay, so let’s take it the next step. If we have seen to our own
estate, taken care to tend to the growth of godliness in our own turn,
then it remains to consider our views of those who are our brothers
and sisters. Do we understand that they are in this same condition?
They may be facing the same challenges of self-perception, the same
points necessitating repentance. And they may very well be pursuing a
course of repentance out of sight of our eyes. We cannot rightly know
the precise state of one another’s development, and I should think it
the height of spiritual arrogance to suppose we can. Even if one is
possessed with an extraordinary gift of spiritual discernment, I doubt
it would supply such depth of detail in its analysis. But we can do
this: We can practice love. Love is not arrogant and boastful (1Co 13:4). We don’t put ourselves forward as
having further advanced, and insist our brothers and sisters ought to
be like ourselves. We don’t run about saying, “look
at me!” Love believes all things, hopes all things (1Co
13:7). Love believes that our brothers and sisters are truly
brothers and sisters, certainly hopes they are. And I must remind
that this hope is not of the, “boy, I wish it were
so,” variety. It is confident expectation.
Take that to the condition of your fellow believer. Love confidently
expects that they are indeed possessed by and of that same love we
know from God and for God. Love confidently expects that the same
Holy Spirit who fellowships with us fellowships with them, guides
their growth every bit as much as our own, directs their intentions
every bit as much as our own. Love confidently expects that these our
brothers, these our sisters, are in fact of the elect, even as
ourselves. Love recognizes that these may not be of the same function
within the body of the Church, yet they are within the body. The
loving foot, taking freely from Paul’s analogies, welcomes the hand
for all its differences, rejoicing in its gifts and lending its own.
I come back to the sense that this unity to which we are called is
far more to do with harmony than with unison. I’ve noted it already,
how Paul comes to this point, in urging those two sisters to be more
harmonious (Php 4:2). That’s the same
message here, really. Make my joy complete by functioning
harmoniously together. Your notes may differ, but you’re singing the
same song. Your gifts may differ, but you’re pursuing the same goal
of demonstrating the love of God, of reaching the lost, of building up
the saved. I could go back to that series for married couples, that
stressed our pink and blue differences, but also that we are both
love-driven, Spirit-filled individuals. We are different but we are
one.
Understand this, and understand it well. We cannot work ourselves
into this state, not in our own power. We can join God in what He is
doing, and if we do so, then these things will surely, certainly work
themselves out. Perhaps if we spent a bit less time gnawing on our
differences, and lent our focus more to those things that define us as
one? Perhaps, as the next verse urges, if we would be less concerned
with our own opinions and priorities, and have concern for what
concerns our brothers, counting one another as more important than
ourselves, then these challenges of one love, one spirit, one mind,
one purpose, would be less challenging. Perhaps we would discover
that they have been the case all along, but we had the wrong glasses
on, and couldn’t see it clearly.
Look. It is only in His love that we rightly love one another. It
is only by His grace that we are knit into this body. It is only by
His Spirit working in us, that we have come to have fellowship with
Him. And it is only by that same Spirit working that we come to have
fellowship one with another. So, then, as the argument goes: It
being the case that you do belong to Christ, bathed in the love of the
Father, knowing the fellowship of the Spirit, you do share
the same love, you are united in spirit with your
fellow believer, you are driving towards the same
goal, however varied your means. You are of the
same mind. Sometimes, the hardest work we have to do consists in
recognizing what is already so.
Beloved, let us pray that where we know ourselves to be falling short
in this, God would be pleased to work upon us that it would not be
so. Let us pray that we would gladly come alongside Him in that
work. If we cannot see this unity among us, let us pray that God
would open our eyes to the truth, that we would stop being so proud of
our own particular strengths and understandings that we suppose those
who don’t share them are somehow inferior, suspect even. Let us pray
for clarity of sight and discernment for each and every one of us,
that we might indeed represent, by our unity, that the God we love and
serve is indeed One, and we are one in Him.
True Humility (06/10/24-06/11/24)
Now comes what I would deem the key verse of this passage. The main
action may be in verse 2, with its command to
complete joy, but the means to unity begin to find expression here in
verse 3. Do nothing from selfishness or vanity, but
everything from humility. This is step one. There is something about
the KJV presentation of this thought that just hits. Perhaps it’s
just the elegance of its more Shakespearian style, but I think it’s
more than that. “Let nothing be done through
strife or vainglory.” That, I think, is a word that could
stand to come back into common usage. We have our more modern idea of
virtue signaling, and I think that would fit quite neatly under the
aspect of vainglory. And you can just see in the term exactly what
the problem is. You’re puffing yourself up, pridefully seeking to
demonstrate or lay claim to your virtuous superiority, but it’s empty
fluff. There’s no validity to it, no content.
This, I think, is ever the problem with such pride as Scripture
denounces. I do think there’s a place for pride, but it is a smallish
place. If one has truly done good, if one has truly sought to pursue
the Lord’s ends, to seek and save the lost with Him, has truly managed
to set themselves aside as to their own wants and desires in
preference for seeing His kingdom come more fully, then yes, I suppose
there’s something there to be proud of. But as Paul observes in his
own case, the one thing to be proud of in all of that is Christ. “As it is written, ‘Let him who boasts, boast in the
LORD’” (1Co 1:31), and, “Let
no one boast in men” (1Co 3:21).
Yet, in his other letter to that church we hear this from our
Apostle. “I know your readiness, of which I boast
about you to the Macedonians” (2Co 9:2).
There’s a distinction here. Boasting in man – whether self or some
other particular hero or exemplar – is inevitably going to prove to be
vainglory. And, I might add, tearing down a man – whether self or
some other particular target – is just that same vainglory in
disguise. Tearing down another always consists in trying to boost
oneself, or some other preferred candidate. And man will always fail
you, which most assuredly includes all your self-driven efforts at
self-improvement.
This is not a call to give up. This is not some nihilistic, nothing
matters, why bother trying conclusion. It is a recognition of facts
on the ground. We are, even as the redeemed, still fallen men. We
fail constantly. If I have not failed you, it is primarily because I
don’t know you. And I have failed me. I fail me every time I begin
to think that I can do this in my own power. I fail me every time I
neglect to turn to my Lord in prayer. I fail me every time I lose
sight of God and become too focused on this world of woe around me.
And how, then, am I to serve as an aid to build anybody else up?
There is a second half to this verse, though: Consider others as
more important than yourself. This is not a matter of dragging
through your days beating yourself emotionally with loud proclamations
of, “I am but a worm, not a man.” It’s not
about abasement. It’s not, after all, a competition, not even a
competition to see who can throw the race more effectively. It’s
simply this: You won’t use your gifts to build up your brother if you
don’t account him more important than your own concerns. We can
become entirely wrapped up in our own issues, our own concerns, our
own interests. Call them what you will. “I’ve
got trouble enough of my own,” is a familiar sentiment,
especially when somebody is unloading theirs on you. “I
don’t have time for this.” I’ve so much to do, I really
can't be sparing you this half hour to listen to you run through your
list of trials and complaints. And how often, do we find ourselves
appending an ‘again’ to that assessment?
But perhaps, just perhaps, the reason you’re hearing it again is
because you’ve never been available to help build this one up, to
redirect them to their Savior the last several times they managed to
get a moment of your time. Perhaps, just perhaps, the problem is
you. Now, in fairness, the problem is probably both, as both are
fallen creatures inclined by nature to fail themselves and each
other. And herein lies one of our primary battles: Don’t let pride
and selfishness drive you! Yet, all around us are constant urgings to
put self first, to compare ourselves to others so we can feel better
about ourselves. All of us know that Pharisee voice within. “At
least I’m not like that guy.” Well, yes,
actually. You are. You’re just too full of yourself to see it, or at
least to acknowledge it and do something about it.
The NET provides the thought, in their footnote to this verse, that
Paul’s language here is far stronger than generally comes through in
translation. They bring it to the point of, “Don’t
even think any thoughts motivated by selfish ambition.”
Okay, now we’ve moved from the painfully difficult into the utterly
impossible! Well, yes. God’s law tends to do that. His standards
are high. His standards are perfect holiness – as perfect as His
own. Don’t even think it! How am I to do this, Lord? Well, let’s
hear His answer, given again through Paul. “We
are destroying speculations and every
lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God. And
we are taking every thought captive to the
obedience of Christ” (2Co 10:5).
This is not Paul boasting. Well, actually, it is, looking at the
context, but boasting of Christ and that authority which he has from
Christ to serve Christ. But his larger point was made in the previous
verses. “Though we walk in the flesh, we do not
war according to the flesh” (2Co 10:3-4),
“for the weapons of our warfare are not fleshly,
but of divine power for the destruction of fortresses.” We
can argue, I suppose, whether his we, in this case, refers to himself
in his apostolic office, or to the children of God more widely, but I
would hold that they should apply to every child of
God.
This is how you avoid thinking thoughts of selfish ambition: Take
every thought captive! How do you do this? Not by your
own strength, not by fleshly exertion. No! You avail yourself of the
power of God which is at your disposal. It’s been awhile, so let me
bring that favorite point of mine to bear. “His
divine power has granted to us everything
pertaining to life and godliness through the true knowledge of Him
who called us by His own glory and excellence.
He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, in order
that by them you might become partakers of the divine nature, having
escaped the lust of this world” (2Pe
1:3-4). You cannot take your thoughts
captive to Christ. But He can. In Him, we can.
Because it is by His power granted to us to this very end. But power,
granted or innate, is of little use if you don’t put it to use.
In a very simple and obvious analogy, there is significant power
flowing into this house. There is the power of electricity lying
latent in wires laced through wall and ceiling, just waiting for a
switch to be thrown somewhere. There is the power of natural gas
ready to produce heat for cooking, for washing, for warming the house
as needed. But it won’t do any good unless the furnace, the water
heater, the stove is ignited. It will just sit in the pipes exerting
no power and achieving no purpose. For all that, this computer on
which I work has powers that would have been unimaginable just a
generation or two ago. Yet, all that power is nothing if I don’t
first turn the machine on, and then utilize it toward some useful
goal. And here, I could note just how readily we set aside that
useful power to go chase after distractions and amusements. We’re
right back at self-interest and vainglory. Be careful, little eyes!
Don’t let selfishness drive you. What else is it when we take this
gift of time and turn it to endless hours of, “amuse
me” demands?
Returning to this idea of regarding others as more important than
yourself, there are a few ways we can understand the intent. Per
Thayer’s Lexicon, where there are two accusatives given, the term hegoumenoi takes on the sense of deem or
think. It’s an assessment made between two options. And given its
middle voice nature, some interaction of subject and object would
suit. But the fact is, we don’t have two accusatives here, unless we
somehow take allelous, each other, as
being both of them, and that’s not entirely out of the question.
But there is another sense the term can take, of allowing this one to
lead, or have authority over you. This kind of reflects the teaching
Scripture gives to married couples. It comes across to some degree in
Paul’s discussion of marital matters, or matters of sexuality, with
the Corinthians. “Let the husband fulfill his
duty to his wife, and the wife to her husband. She does not have
authority over her own body, but the husband does; and he doesn’t
have authority over his own body, either. The wife does” (1Co 7:3-4). And this, I should note, comes on
the heels of him observing our union with the Holy Spirit. “Your
body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from
God. You are not your own!” (1Co
6:19). These are our deepest, most intimate relationships.
But the same reality holds within the communion of the Church. In
that setting, it still holds true: You are not your own. That’s
pretty much the message here. Have in yourself this mindset that
every other person in this congregation has command of you. Now, by
corollary, you also have command over every other person ion this
congregation. But it’s not an authority to be abused. Worldly rulers
lord it over their subjects, and give exercise to their authority over
them. But for us, it must not be so. Rather, whoever wishes to
become great should set himself to be servant of all, even slave to
all. For this is the example we have from our Lord, from the Son of
Man, God Incarnate (Mt 20:25-28).
There is humility in action. It consists in making oneself available
to serve, in whatever fashion, whatever capacity. It consists in
seeking to know the needs of your fellow believer, not so as to build
up a body of gossipy tidbits to share, but so as to know how you can
be a means to strengthen them. Here is your humble calling: Admonish
the unruly, encourage the fainthearted, help the weak, and be patient
with all (1Th 5:14). Build one another up
in holy faith. Whatever gifts it may be that God has been so gracious
as to give you, put them to work to serve these ends. They’re not for
you to preen. They’re for you to serve.
And observe: This is not a one-time issue. It’s not an occasional
offering of service. These are stative actions. They are intended to
describe our steady-state condition. Daily, hourly, moment by moment,
do nothing from selfishness. Leave no place for self in this. And
here, I think, we could and should extend the call even to our
workplace, our mundane daily activities. This can be difficult, but
it is a marker of Christian maturity. And it’s exactly the same
action we are having urged upon us here. Consider your coworker and
his or her difficulty more important than your own immediate
concerns. After all, if you have hit a roadblock, or some quandary
that you simply can’t resolve, would you not desire that your
coworker, whom you feel sure has the insight to help, or who can
supply what is needed to clear that roadblock would drop what he is
doing to see that resolved? I know I would. I also know how
frustrated I can get when this does not happen. And yet, how
frustrated do I get when yet another coworker has interrupted my flow
to address their problem? How frustrated do I get when my beloved
wife comes with her concerns, or her excitements, and does the same?
And what should be my response? Regard this
interruption as far more important than my personal tasks and
concerns. Consider helping them far more critical than maintaining my
stream of thought. Allow them to have command of my time, authority
over my attention. And, lest there be any mistake about it, do this
without rancor, without annoyance, even inwardly noted. Oh yes,
here’s another of those impossible challenges! And the means remains
the same: Lay hold of God. Lay hold of the power He has set at my
disposal to be the man He has designed me to be, called me to be.
Display real humility, and stop being so darned self-centered.
Look, I think it is the common condition of every engineer to view
his or her particular task as the most critical. But it just ain’t
so. There is the countervailing reality that everything is critical.
The system cannot work except every component in the system works.
The goal cannot be achieved except every one of us is contributing his
part towards reaching it. And often times, that contribution is going
to consist in picking up our flagging coworker to carry them forward.
Often times, we shall find ourselves needing to be carried as our own
energy ebbs. If it’s so in the workplace, or in the home, how much
more in the Church, in the spiritual warfare to which we’ve signed
up? In this battle, if you would march under the banner of Christ,
let each other have command of you as needed, and by this know that
you in turn can call upon your brother to have your back as well. And
all done in Christ, all done in the power God so richly supplies.
This is not some one-off instruction from Paul. It is heard
repeatedly in his instruction to the churches. It is perhaps plainest
as he addresses the church in Ephesus. “Be
subject to one another in the fear of Christ” (Eph
5:21). There it is! Just like husband and wife, so each of
you in all your interactions. But it’s everywhere! “Be
devoted to one another in brotherly love. Give one another
preference in honor” (Ro 12:10).
This is your antidote for pride, which is ever our challenge. This is
how you achieve the instruction given the Galatians. “Don’t
become boastful. Don’t challenge or envy one another.”
How? Give preference to them instead. Grant them the right to
command you, and be subject to them, not as resentful slaves left no
choice, but as brothers only too glad to be of service.
And all of this brings us right back around to pursuing that unity
which was set forth, this singleness of mind. Going back to Ephesians
again, “With all humility, gentleness, and
patience, show forbearance to each other in love. Be diligent to
preserve the unity of the Spirit and the bond of peace” (Eph 4:2-3). There are going to be times when
this is challenging. Of course there are. Some of us can be a bit
prickly at times. Some of us are a bit prickly at most times. We may
not respond as well as one would hope when called upon to be of aid to
another. We may not respond well at all when a brother loves us
enough to rebuke the sin in us. It’s going to need patience to
persevere in love. We will have those among us who are more
challenged by the process of sanctification, who don’t make progress
at the rate we think they should. For all that, we may
not be making progress at the rate we think we should. Or worse
still, we may not be making progress at the rate we think we are.
Patience! The call is not to expel the underachiever. The call is
not to withdraw into our little circle of those most like ourselves in
thought and progress. The call is to bear with one another in love,
to seek first and foremost to preserve the unity of
the Spirit.
Now, think about that for just a moment. Get below the surface of
that command. Does the Holy Spirit need our help preserving His
unity? I think not! Is He incapable of preserving this unity of His
own accord? Unthinkable! He is God, after all, and who shall stop
Him from achieving all that He purposes? Certainly not you or me. We
have neither the wit nor the power. But what if, in His purpose, He
has determined that we are to be His means to unity? What if He has
decided in His wisdom that He will not uphold this unity any farther
than we who are being held? That is to say, what if God is insistent
upon having a willing partner in the work?
We have, as the Church has had, it seems, throughout its existence,
this terrible debate between understanding the sovereignty of God –
that His will most assuredly will be done, and the
free-willed liberty of man as a moral agent. If there’s no choice,
how do we choose? Or, if we choose and so often choose
non-compliance, how is God sovereign? I continue to come back to that
which my brother long ago said, for it really does seem to capture the
reality of the thing. Man’s will is free, but God’s will is freer.
If He must, He most assuredly can override your decision, or, as seems
more often to be the case, simply turn your ill-intended actions to
His good purpose. Surely, if He can do so with Satan, He can manage
as much with you or me. But His strong preference is that we might
labor side-by-side with Him, be coworkers with Him, first in the field
of our own sanctification, and then, in the work of coming alongside
one another, as we see here, in mutual support.
Let’s touch on the last part of this passage. It’s a curious bit of
wording, difficult of translation simply because it seems so much as
though there are critical words missing. But such is the nature of
Greek. Literally, it reads something like, “Every
man look not on the himself, but and every man look on the other.”
Now, that makes just about zero sense left like that in English. And
when the KJV seeks to add that sense by offering, “Look
not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of
others,” it comes across almost as advocating envy. But that
can’t be it, can it? The NASB, and several of our other more modern
translations swap ‘things’ for ‘interests’,
which helps a bit. The God’s Word Translation, for example, offers
us, “Don’t be concerned only about your own
interests, but also be concerned about the interests of others.”
That’s certainly a step in the right direction, and fits well with the
idea of mutual regard, mutual submission.
But then I come to Darby’s translation, which gives us, “Regarding
not each one his own qualities, but each those of others also.”
This clearly couples us back to this issue of regarding others as more
important than oneself, and that seems, in turn an apt solution for
the passage. Yes, you have your own finer qualities, but they are
incomplete. I dare say, they are incomplete by design, for we are
designed for community, designed for interdependency in this body of
Christ. We simply cannot do without one another. We need each
other. Some of us lose sight of that, but that doesn’t change the
truth of it. And I dare say, if you seek to be doing that which God
is calling you to do, if you find yourself in any way actively
pursuing a gospel-focused life, you will soon enough come up against
that which is too big for you, and you will soon enough come up
against it in such fashion as leaves you short of access to God.
There is that assurance from God, given to a disobedient people. “I will break down your pride of power. I will make
your sky like iron, your earth like bronze” (Lev
26:19). This is not, I should observe, an assurance we ought
to seek after. But neither is it an assurance of condemnation. No!
It’s a disciplinary action, undertaken to bring us back to the place
of safety, the place of obedience to the God Who Is. God loves us
enough to do as He must to see us back on course. But, as is observed
in Hebrews 12:11, no discipline is
pleasant at the time. Oh, but afterwards! Afterwards it yields the
peaceful fruit of righteousness, and in that fruit we find true
humility. In that fruit, we become peacemakers. In that fruit, we
let go of ourselves just a bit, our egos and priorities, and turn our
attention to those around us, to their needs, their interests, their
qualities. And as we do so, we may very well be struck with wonder at
what God has been doing in them.
This is our final admonition from this passage. Direct your
attention to this. Direct your attention to your brother. This is
not an attempt to stir up envy. It’s not a call to compete with him
and seek to show him up. It is, however, a call to set aside your
navel-gazing self-involvement and see what’s around you. Get over
yourself! Be strong enough to see your own need. Be weak enough to
recognize their strengths and appreciate them. Start to care. Or, if
that’s too harsh, start caring more. There’s always room for
improvement. I remember that instruction given me as a young manager,
come review time. However well you think of your employee, leave room
for improvement, for there is always room to improve. How much more
in this process of sanctification?
The call is to unity. This is the goal of Paul’s command here, God’s
command here. The how of unity lies in this: True humility and
compassionate care. We can be ever so humble and still remain wholly
self-involved. But that won’t do. We can be truly compassionate and
yet find clever ways to be boastfully proud of it. And that won’t do,
either. It needs both, working together harmoniously. And as we work
thus harmoniously in our individual actions, we shall discover that we
are working harmoniously as a body. And isn’t that the goal?
I’ll wrap up with Romans 15, which again
gives very similar instruction to that which we have in front of us.
No surprise. What Paul taught in one church, he taught in all. The
strong, he tells us, should bear with the weak, and not just suit
themselves. There is no place in Christ for demanding our rights and
privileges. That doesn’t mean they are illegitimate and falsely held.
It means that they aren’t the point, and they ought not to dominate
our thinking. To continue. Let each one seek his neighbor’s
good, to be pleasing to him, to build him up. After all –
and this really ought to ram the point home for us who believe – even
Christ our Lord, the God of the Universe, did not please Himself, but
rather, “the reproaches of those who reproached
You fell on Me.” Far better for us if we would stop being
quite so concerned with our appearance and reputation, and become more
concerned with how we’re all really doing. Far better that we would
cease trying to prove to one another how self-sufficient we are, and
admit our need for one another, our need for Christ. The world
doesn’t need another boastful Christian. The world needs a
compassionate guide to lead them to Christ, and to make Him known with
all humility.
Lord, I know full well that I have been preaching to myself
throughout this exercise, and I have been coming face to face with
my own inadequacies. First, thank You for not leaving me to wallow
in my pridefulness. But I know that pridefulness remains.
Otherwise, you’d have no need of bringing it to my attention. I
know I’ve made progress, for You have indeed been working in and on
me, and thank You for that! But I know as well that I can still be
too ready to be the man with all the answers, to boldly assert
things barely understood, and to simply laugh off or ridicule any
disagreement. Teach me, Lord. Give me wisdom to deal with
disagreement, with divergent perspectives. Help me to know the
boundary between those varied ideas that yet abide within
good-hearted desire for You in truth, and those which present such
heresies as must be confronted. And should confrontation prove
needful, I beg of You to work upon me such that I can do so with
this humble, compassionate love that ought rightly to apply, rather
than with arrogance, frustration, and a demand for capitulation.
You know, after all, how thoroughly I dislike confrontation, dread
it, even. Yet I know that it is sometimes needful. And like
discipline, it is never pleasant at the time. Yet, there is also a
likeness in the result, isn’t there; that it produces the fruit of
peace. So, Lord, grant me the willingness to love as You have loved
me, the willingness to risk insult and rejection if need be, in
order that Your love may win through. I am Your servant, and sorry
that I am so often such a poor one. Help me to improve.